inicio email me! RSS

But what these unobservant birds

Poodlerat’s book blog

« Fantasy Classics ChallengeHomeThe Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy »

Dune

62. Dune by Frank Herbert (Science Fiction) 474 p.

DuneSci-fi Classics Challenge

Paul Atreides is the fifteen-year-old son and heir of Duke Leto Atreides and his concubine, Lady Jessica. When the family is forced to leave their home planet and take control of the desert planet of Arrakis, called Dune, it sets in motion traitorous plots and a strange fate for Paul.

I don’t think I’ve ever read a science fiction novel with quite this level of world-building before, or which makes so few concessions to the reader’s ignorance. And that’s a good thing.

Of course, Dune is one of those books that everyone has heard of, but I had no clear idea of what it was about, or what to expect from it. It turned out to be unlike anything I could have imagined: rich in cultural, religious, mystical, and ecological detail, with a strong plot and spare, elegant prose. There was absolutely no info-dumping; if anything, the level of information available to the reader was often rather sparse. The reader learned what the characters learned, but the characters had an understanding of the history and culture of the universe they inhabited that the reader lacked. It imparted a realism to the Dune universe that couldn’t have been acquired any other way.

Despite its undeniable quality, I was a little disappointed in this book. I enjoyed the first section immensely, but the other two didn’t quite go in the direction I was expecting, and I think I would have loved the book more if they had.

[spoilers]

I would have liked to see more attention paid to the ecology of Arrakis, and the sandworms in particular. The first section seemed to be building up a bit of a mystery about the creatures, and how they and the spice were related, but there was no particular grand revelation, and what was revealed was somewhat anti-climactic. I suppose I wanted Dune to be an ecological discovery novel, but it turned out to be dominated by a more conventional political plot.

I really felt for the characters in the first section, but I had trouble maintaining a level of interest in them, especially the secondary characters, whose development stagnated in the latter two-thirds of the book. I also couldn’t bring myself to care much about Paul Atreides regaining his dukedom, so the whole political side of things fell rather flat for me. I also think Frank Herbert missed a chance when he chose not to show us Paul Atreides with his son, or much of his feeling for the boy, since that made it harder to empathize with him when his son was killed.

[/spoilers]

I knew, coming into this challenge, that many classic science fiction novels were written by men, for men, and would probably do things with women that I wouldn’t be all that fond of. In that sense, Dune wasn’t a surprise; Herbert preserves many of women’s traditional roles in sci-fi. He does maintain an interesting, vital, and sympathetic female main character throughout the novel, which is good. I would have liked to have been able to expect better, but how can I hold Herbert to a standard even many modern science fiction authors fail to meet?

Still, aside from a few quibbles, Dune is an awe-inspiring achievement. I can see why it is so often compared to The Lord of the Rings. I’m eager to read the rest of the Dune saga, and to see the movie and TV miniseries.

Books read: 62/100 (62%)
Pages read: 18,579/25,000 (74%)

Tags: , , ,

6 Comments »

CJHill wrote, on July 10th, 2007 at 9:37 pm:

Well, I’ve read the books and I’ve seen the first verision of the movie… and I must admit that I’m still not sure I got it.

The writing is amazing and the development, as you said, is incredible, but still.

Did I understand it all? I have no idea.

cjh

Poodlerat wrote, on July 11th, 2007 at 12:15 am:

I definitely feel like there were things I missed. It seemed like the characters made a lot of assumptions that I didn’t always understand. It didn’t really hinder my enjoyment of the book, though, although there are people I wouldn’t recommend it to for that very reason (although most of them don’t like sci-fi, anyway, so no loss for them.)

Siew Cooper wrote, on July 12th, 2007 at 9:36 am:

I’m not sure if I want to read this; I’ve watched the weird Lynch film, and I really enjoyed the miniseries, but I’m not a bit sci-fi fan myself. I keep walking past the row of Herbert books at the library, and losing heart…it would be great if you watch the miniseries and do a compare post.

Poodlerat wrote, on July 12th, 2007 at 11:01 am:

I definitely will at some point, but I’m not the hugest film buff, so unless it’s showing on the Space station soon, it probably won’t be for a while!

After reading it, I was surprised they made the Lynch film at all—I’m curious to see how they fit such a long book into one movie.

Siew Cooper wrote, on July 12th, 2007 at 6:47 pm:

My understanding is - not very well. From other reports, the miniseries fared much better, and I assume it was because it wasn’t shrunk into a four and a half hour marathon

Poodlerat wrote, on July 12th, 2007 at 6:51 pm:

The Lynch movie is four and a half hours? *blink*

Wow. That’s…a very long movie.

I’ve heard the Lynch version isn’t very faithful, and I had a feeling it was at least partly due to time constraints. I’m quite curious to see how the two versions stack up to the books.

Your comment